City planning for developers

Compare development options before the plan is fixed

Move quickly from site potential to reviewable scenarios. Test programme, density, housing mix, parking, greenery, environmental effects and feasibility in one shared 3D planning context.

Early option testing Programme and feasibility Environmental context Client-ready review
Developers exploring a project in 3D Cityplanner on laptop and tablet

Turn a site question into comparable development directions

Developers need to test what a location can support before too many assumptions become fixed. 3D Cityplanner connects the visible plan with programme, land use, parking, spatial effects and project indicators.

Understand the site

Combine the location, existing buildings, infrastructure, constraints and relevant GIS data before defining the first proposal.

Generate first options

Create road structures, plots, buildings and housing mixes as editable starting points for development scenarios.

Test programme and density

Compare dwellings, building types, floor area, coverage, density and the spatial organisation of the site.

Include parking and public space

Review parking demand and capacity together with access, greenery and the quality of public space.

Connect spatial and financial assumptions

Relate the scenario to costs, revenues, residual land value and project-specific feasibility indicators.

Explain the proposal clearly

Use one shared 3D model in client meetings, municipal discussions and multidisciplinary project reviews.

Explore more than one development direction

Early development improves when alternatives can be tested quickly rather than defending the first massing study.

  • Use existing infrastructure or generate new road and block structures.
  • Assign parts of the area to detached, semi-detached, terraced or stacked housing.
  • Reserve zones for parking, greenery, public space or other programme elements.
  • Use configurable building and housing types, including organisation-specific models.
  • Adjust the generated result and keep comparing alternatives.
Automatically generated area development scenario in 3D Cityplanner
Programme and financial parameters connected to a development scenario in 3D Cityplanner

Keep the figures connected to the visible plan

A scenario should not only look convincing. Its programme, parking, financial assumptions and environmental consequences need to remain visible during review.

  • Track dwelling numbers, floor area, density and housing mix.
  • Compare parking demand, capacity and land take.
  • Review costs, revenues and residual land-value assumptions.
  • Use KPIs for greenery, trees, public space, housing and other project goals.
  • Assess shadow, sightlines, road-traffic noise and heat stress before further design work.

From first question to a reviewed next step

Use the platform progressively: begin with the site and add detail, assumptions and specialist information as the project develops.

1

Read the site

Bring together the boundary, context, constraints and available project data.

2

Create options

Generate or draw several spatial directions with different programme assumptions.

3

Test feasibility

Compare quantities, parking, financial assumptions, KPIs and environmental effects.

4

Choose the next direction

Use the shared model to align the development team, client and municipality.

Designed for early comparison, not detailed engineering

3D Cityplanner supports early and area-scale decisions. Detailed architecture, engineering, formal financial models and specialist compliance studies continue in the tools responsible for those disciplines.

Questions about this solution

Developers can compare programme, housing mix, density, parking, greenery, financial assumptions, KPIs and selected environmental effects.
Yes. Area generation can create editable road, block, plot, housing and public-space structures as a starting point.
Yes. Existing roads and infrastructure can be used as a basis for a new layout where appropriate.
It supports early comparison of costs, revenues and residual land-value assumptions, but does not replace a formal financial model.
Yes. Browser-based views, bookmarks and scenario comparisons make project reviews and discussions more concrete.

Explore this workflow with your own planning question Start a free demo